Reviewer Resources
Reviewers receive practical resources to help deliver clear, high quality evaluations. These tools support consistency, ethics compliance, and efficient decision making for arthritis research submissions.
Review Checklists
Checklists help reviewers assess methods, results, ethics, and clinical relevance. They ensure that key issues are addressed and provide a structured approach to complex manuscripts. They save time and stress.
Sample Reviews
Sample reviews illustrate how to structure feedback, distinguish major from minor issues, and provide constructive guidance. New reviewers can use these samples to build confidence.
Decision Templates
Templates guide the organization of comments into major and minor issues. This structure helps editors prioritize revisions and supports consistent editorial decisions.
Statistical Review Tips
Resources include reminders to evaluate study design, sample size justification, and appropriate statistical tests. Reviewers can request help when results are complex or when reporting is unclear.
Clinical Impact Guidance
Reviewers receive prompts to assess whether findings are clinically meaningful and applicable to patient care. This ensures that arthritis research remains aligned with real world outcomes.
Ethics and Reporting Guidance
Resources include reminders on conflicts of interest, informed consent, and clinical trial registration. Reviewers can request guidance on reporting standards such as CONSORT, PRISMA, and STROBE. These reminders help protect patients and ensure compliance with funder requirements. Use them especially for clinical trials, patient reported outcomes, and imaging studies as needed.
Confidentiality Reminders
Reviewer resources highlight confidentiality expectations and discourage the use of unpublished data. This protects author work and maintains the integrity of peer review.
Responding to Editor Queries
Editors may request clarification on specific points raised in your review. Resources include short response templates to help you reply quickly and maintain consistency.
Time Management Tips
Guidance is available on structuring review time, prioritizing major issues, and providing concise feedback. These tips help you deliver timely reviews without sacrificing quality.
Editorial Office Support
The editorial office is available to answer questions about review scope, ethics concerns, or manuscript handling. Reviewers can reach out for clarification at any time.
Scoring Guidance
Some submissions require scoring for novelty, methods, and clinical impact. Use consistent ratings and explain low scores with evidence. Request clarification on statistical issues if needed.
Need a Reviewer Resource?
Contact the editorial office for checklists, templates, or additional guidance.
