• Current affiliation and contact details
• Areas of expertise and methodological skills
• Recent publications or clinical experience
• Availability and preferred review load

Clear availability helps the editorial team assign reviews responsibly and maintain timely decisions.

• Indicate the number of reviews you can take per quarter
• List preferred topics and study designs
• Note any periods of limited availability

• Hypertension clinical management
• Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring
• Pharmacologic therapy and adherence
• Cardiorenal and vascular outcomes
• Lifestyle and behavioral interventions

Reviewers should respond promptly to invitations and complete reviews within agreed timelines.

Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, unbiased assessments and disclose conflicts of interest.

Reviewers must keep manuscripts confidential and disclose any conflicts before accepting an assignment.

Reviewers should decline assignments where a personal or financial relationship could influence evaluation.

Reviewers should have recent publication or clinical experience in hypertension, cardiology, or vascular care.

Experience with study design or statistical analysis is valued for thorough evaluation.

Reviewers are asked to confirm availability promptly and complete reviews within agreed timelines.

• List specific hypertension keywords
• Include methodological strengths and tools
• Note availability windows during the year
• Provide recent publications or clinical roles

Reviewer activity can be documented for institutional service records and professional development files.

Consistent reviewing may lead to invitations for special issues or editorial roles.

Accurate profiles help distribute workload fairly and improve match quality for assignments.

Updated expertise details support rapid reviewer matching.

Clear availability helps maintain timely review cycles.