Article Processing Charges for Surgery Proceedings
Transparent publication pricing for minimally invasive, laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery research with no submission fee and quality-led editorial decisions.
What the APC Covers
Charges are applied only after acceptance and are separated from editorial decision making.
Journal of Surgery Proceedings uses an open-access publishing model so surgical evidence is available to clinicians, surgical trainees, hospitals, and health systems without paywall barriers. APCs support editorial triage, external peer review coordination, production formatting, DOI and metadata registration, online hosting, and long-term archiving workflows.
No submission fee is required. Manuscripts are assessed for scientific quality, methodological rigor, and practical relevance to perioperative care and procedural innovation. Payment discussion starts only after an editorial acceptance decision, preserving independent peer review and fair scientific assessment.
For institutions and funded projects, APC invoicing can be aligned with procurement requirements, grant reporting structures, and administrative billing controls. Early billing alignment helps reduce post-acceptance delays and shortens time to final publication release.
Standard APC by Article Category
Indicative publication charges for core manuscript types in surgery research and practice.
| Article Type | APC | Scope Example |
|---|---|---|
| Original Research | USD 1,850 | Clinical outcomes, procedural innovation, perioperative safety |
| Systematic Review or Meta Analysis | USD 2,050 | Evidence synthesis on surgical techniques and outcomes |
| Narrative Review | USD 1,900 | Current standards and emerging pathways in minimally invasive surgery |
| Case Report or Case Series | USD 980 | Novel operative decision making and rare procedural findings |
| Short Communication | USD 760 | Focused technical updates and early translational insights |
| Editorial or Commentary | USD 450 | Expert viewpoint and policy-relevant surgical discussion |
| Letter to the Editor | USD 350 | Scholarly response and methodological discussion |
APC figures are reviewed periodically to maintain publication quality and global access viability for surgery scholarship.
How Authors Can Reduce APC Burden
Multiple support pathways are available without affecting peer-review fairness.
Membership Discounts
Active journal membership tiers provide meaningful APC reductions for eligible submissions.
Institutional Alignment
Universities and hospitals can coordinate APC processing through institutional workflows.
Regional Relief
Authors from eligible lower-income regions can request partial or full APC consideration.
Hardship Review
Documented funding constraints can be reviewed case by case with independent handling.
Waiver assessment is administrative and independent from editorial evaluation. Submission quality criteria remain identical for all authors regardless of payment pathway.
Operational Guidance for Research Teams
Practical planning helps teams avoid avoidable delays after acceptance.
For multicenter surgery studies, APC ownership should be assigned during protocol and budget planning, not after peer review. Teams that pre-define payer responsibility move through acceptance and production much faster.
Before submission, coordinate with grants and finance offices on invoice format, purchase order references, and reporting requirements. This is especially important for publicly funded studies where publication outputs are tied to formal compliance records.
If your manuscript includes extensive supplementary content, operative videos, protocol appendices, or structured datasets, ensure files are publication-ready at submission stage. Strong file quality reduces technical queries and accelerates production.
For billing, discount, or waiver support, contact [email protected] with manuscript context so the editorial office can align administrative steps without interrupting scientific workflow.
Financial Planning for Surgical Research Teams
Treat APC readiness as part of protocol planning, not post-acceptance administration.
In surgery research, delays rarely come from science alone. They often come from late financial alignment after acceptance. Principal investigators should assign APC ownership before submission and define whether payment will be covered by grant funding, departmental publication support, or institutional open-access agreements. Early ownership prevents avoidable delays when manuscripts are editorially ready for release.
For multicenter projects, use a single payment governance note in the internal study file. This note should identify billing contact, reimbursement logic, and procurement requirements such as purchase orders or supplier registration. Teams that predefine this pathway usually reduce publication lag and avoid repeated administrative correspondence after acceptance.
When waiver eligibility may apply, authors should prepare supporting documentation early and submit requests through the recommended channel. Waiver review remains independent from peer review and does not alter editorial standards. Clear documentation helps the office make faster decisions while maintaining fairness across submissions.
If your manuscript includes extended supplementary material, surgical media, or repository-linked assets, production preparation should begin during revision. Well-organized files reduce technical checks and make APC-to-publication transition more predictable.
Final APC Control Notes
Pre-acceptance planning reduces post-acceptance delays.
Before final submission, confirm invoice destination, payer authority, and administrative documentation requirements. This is especially important for multicenter surgical studies where funding responsibility is shared across institutions. Clear governance in advance avoids rapid-cycle payment delays after acceptance and helps teams move smoothly from editorial decision to online publication.
When waiver support is requested, include complete contextual documentation at first contact so review can be completed efficiently without repeated follow-up.
Final APC note: pre-approve publication spending internally before submission to avoid acceptance-to-publication delay and maintain predictable release timelines for clinically relevant surgical findings.
Submit Your Surgical Manuscript
Choose your preferred route to start peer review in Journal of Surgery Proceedings.
For support: [email protected]