Review Templates
Structured report formats covering methods, interpretation, ethics, and reporting completeness.
Reviewer Resource Toolkit
Reviewer Resources
Reviewer Resources
Journal of Medical and Surgical Urology
Use practical reviewer tools to deliver precise, consistent, and decision-ready evaluations in JMSU peer review.
45%APC Savings
ClinicalResearch Reach
FastEditorial Routing
Reviewer Support
Resources Available to JMSU Reviewers
JMSU provides practical resources to help reviewers deliver structured, fair, and high-value reports.
Resource-supported review improves consistency across assignments and strengthens editorial decision quality.
These tools are designed for both experienced reviewers and experts newly joining journal workflows.
Resource Toolkit
Tools for Better Review Quality
Standardized materials help reviewers evaluate manuscripts more efficiently and comprehensively.
Policy Summaries
Quick references for conflicts, confidentiality, integrity concerns, and disclosure expectations.
Checklist Aids
Stepwise prompts to reduce omission risk in manuscript evaluation.
Escalation Guidance
Clear channels for reporting suspected ethical or data integrity problems.
Communication Tips
Practical language guidance for clear, constructive recommendations.
Standards Updates
Periodic reminders on evolving reporting and policy expectations.
Review Efficiency
How Resources Improve Turnaround and Clarity
Consistent use of reviewer resources improves both speed and recommendation usefulness.
- Reduces time spent structuring reports from scratch.
- Improves consistency of evidence-based critique across assignments.
- Helps reviewers communicate major versus minor concerns clearly.
- Supports fair handling of ethics and conflict-related issues.
- Strengthens decision readiness for editorial teams.
Best practice: Structured reviewer resources increase quality while preserving the depth of expert judgment.
Reviewer toolkits improve consistency of methodological, ethical, and reporting checks.
Policy guidance helps reviewers handle difficult cases with confidence and fairness.
Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve the utility of recommendations.
Support channels enable quick clarification of procedural questions during review.
Updated standards references keep evaluations aligned with current publication expectations.
Reviewer toolkits improve consistency of methodological, ethical, and reporting checks.
Policy guidance helps reviewers handle difficult cases with confidence and fairness.
Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve the utility of recommendations.
Support channels enable quick clarification of procedural questions during review.
Updated standards references keep evaluations aligned with current publication expectations.
Reviewer toolkits improve consistency of methodological, ethical, and reporting checks.
Policy guidance helps reviewers handle difficult cases with confidence and fairness.
Structured templates reduce omission risk and improve the utility of recommendations.
Support channels enable quick clarification of procedural questions during review.
Use JMSU Reviewer Support Tools
Apply templates and policy references to improve review quality, clarity, and turnaround reliability.
Editorial office: [email protected]
