Submit Your Healthcare Systems Research to JPCH
Join leading health services researchers advancing palliative care delivery, policy, and quality improvement
⚠ Health Services Research Focus
JPCH specializes in healthcare systems research, policy analysis, quality improvement initiatives, and health informatics in palliative and hospice care settings. We publish non-clinical research that advances healthcare delivery, organizational effectiveness, and system-level outcomes. If your work focuses on individual patient treatment protocols or clinical interventions, please consider our clinical companion journals.
Two Convenient Submission Methods
Choose the submission pathway that best fits your workflow. Both methods provide the same rigorous peer review and publication standards.
ManuscriptZone Portal
Our comprehensive manuscript management system designed for researchers who value transparency and real-time tracking throughout the peer review process.
- Auto-save functionality prevents data loss
- Guided workflow with step-by-step instructions
- Real-time submission status tracking
- Direct access to reviewer comments and editor decisions
- Secure document management and version control
- Complete submission in 15 minutes
Quick Submission Form
A streamlined alternative for straightforward submissions when you need a faster, simpler process without account creation.
- No account registration required
- Simple, single-page submission form
- Ideal for straightforward manuscripts
- Fast upload process for all files
- Email confirmation upon submission
- Complete in under 10 minutes
Article Types We Publish
JPCH welcomes diverse research contributions that advance health services research in palliative and hospice care. All submissions undergo rigorous peer review by experts in healthcare systems, policy, and quality improvement.
Original Research Articles
Healthcare delivery studies, quality improvement initiatives, policy analyses, health informatics research, and system-level outcome evaluations in palliative care settings.
Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
Comprehensive evidence syntheses of healthcare systems interventions, policy effectiveness, quality metrics, and organizational models in palliative care delivery.
Health Policy Analyses
Evaluations of healthcare policies, regulatory frameworks, reimbursement models, and system-level interventions affecting palliative and hospice care delivery.
Quality Improvement Reports
Implementation studies, process improvement initiatives, performance metrics analyses, and organizational change evaluations in healthcare delivery systems.
Health Informatics Studies
Electronic health records research, data analytics applications, health information technology evaluations, and digital health system implementations.
Healthcare Economics Research
Cost-effectiveness analyses, resource utilization studies, economic evaluations, and financial sustainability assessments of palliative care programs.
Organizational Case Studies
In-depth analyses of healthcare system innovations, organizational transformations, program implementations, and institutional change processes.
Methodology Papers
Novel research methods, measurement instruments, data collection techniques, and analytical approaches for health services research.
Rapid Communications
Time-sensitive findings on emerging healthcare system challenges, policy changes, or urgent quality improvement needs in palliative care delivery.
Perspectives & Commentaries
Expert viewpoints on healthcare policy debates, system-level challenges, future directions in palliative care delivery, and emerging trends.
Literature Reviews
Comprehensive overviews of health services research domains, policy landscapes, quality improvement approaches, or organizational models.
Educational Program Evaluations
Assessments of healthcare workforce training, professional development initiatives, and educational interventions for palliative care providers.
Pre-Submission Checklist
Ensure your manuscript meets all requirements before submission to expedite the review process and avoid delays.
Peer Review Timeline
We maintain transparent, predictable timelines to help you plan your research dissemination strategy. Our expert reviewers in health services research provide constructive feedback to strengthen your work.
Submission & Initial Screening
Your manuscript undergoes administrative checks for completeness and adherence to submission guidelines. We verify that all required files are included and properly formatted.
3 daysEditor Assignment & Plagiarism Check
An editor with expertise in your specific area of health services research is assigned. Your manuscript undergoes plagiarism screening using iThenticate to ensure originality.
2 daysPeer Review Process
Expert reviewers in healthcare systems, policy, quality improvement, or health informatics evaluate your manuscript for methodological rigor, significance, and contribution to the field.
21 daysEditorial Decision
The editor reviews all feedback and makes a decision: accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject. You receive detailed reviewer comments and clear guidance for any required revisions.
28 days totalRevision & Re-review
If revisions are requested, you submit your revised manuscript with a detailed response to reviewers. The editor or reviewers assess whether concerns have been adequately addressed.
14 daysAcceptance & Production
Upon acceptance, your manuscript enters production for copyediting, formatting, and typesetting. You review and approve the final proofs before publication.
10 daysOnline Publication
Your article is published online with immediate open access, making it freely available to healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers worldwide.
60 days totalWhy Health Services Researchers Choose JPCH
We understand the unique challenges of publishing health systems research and provide specialized support for your work.
Specialized Indexing
Your research gains worldwide visibility through indexing in Google Scholar, connecting it with the global scientific community.
Fast Decisions
Average time to first decision: 21 days. We respect your time and provide prompt, constructive feedback from expert reviewers in healthcare systems research.
High Acceptance Rate
65% acceptance rate reflects our commitment to supporting quality health services research while maintaining rigorous peer review standards.
Global Open Access
Immediate worldwide visibility with no paywalls. Your research influences healthcare policy and practice from day one of publication.
COPEship
Committee on Publication Ethics member, ensuring the highest standards of research integrity, ethical publishing practices, and author protection.
APC Waivers Available
Financial support for researchers from low-income countries and unfunded studies. We believe financial constraints should not limit knowledge dissemination.
Expert Reviewers
Peer review by specialists in healthcare delivery, policy analysis, quality improvement, and health informatics who understand your research context.
Author Support
Dedicated editorial assistance throughout the submission and review process. We help you navigate peer review and strengthen your manuscript.
What to Expect After Submission
Initial Review (Days 1-3)
Your manuscript undergoes administrative screening to verify completeness and compliance with submission guidelines. We check that all required sections are included, figures are properly formatted, and ethics approvals are documented. You receive confirmation of successful submission within 24 hours.
Editor Assignment (Days 4-5)
An editor with expertise in your specific area of health services research is assigned to manage your manuscript. The editor conducts a plagiarism check using iThenticate and performs an initial assessment of scope and quality. Manuscripts with similarity indices above 30% are returned for revision before peer review.
Peer Review (Days 6-26)
The editor invites 2-3 expert reviewers with specialized knowledge in healthcare systems, policy, quality improvement, or health informatics. Reviewers evaluate your manuscript for methodological rigor, significance of findings, clarity of presentation, and contribution to health services research. They provide detailed, constructive feedback to strengthen your work.
Editorial Decision (Day 28)
Based on reviewer feedback, the editor makes one of four decisions:
- Accept: Your manuscript is accepted for publication with no or minimal changes required
- Minor Revisions: Small improvements needed, typically addressing clarity, formatting, or minor methodological points
- Major Revisions: Significant improvements required, such as additional analyses, expanded discussion, or methodological clarifications
- Reject: The manuscript does not meet publication standards or is outside the journal's scope
Revision Process
If revisions are requested, you receive detailed reviewer comments and editor guidance. You have 30 days to submit your revised manuscript along with a point-by-point response to reviewer comments. The revised manuscript undergoes re-review (typically 14 days) to ensure all concerns have been adequately addressed.
Acceptance and Production
Upon final acceptance, your manuscript enters the production phase. Our team handles copyediting, formatting, and typesetting to prepare your article for publication. You review and approve final proofs before online publication. The entire process from acceptance to publication typically takes 10 days.
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Structure Your Manuscript
Health services research manuscripts should follow a clear, logical structure that facilitates understanding of your study design, methods, and findings:
- Title: Concise and descriptive, clearly indicating the study focus and setting
- Abstract: 250-300 words summarizing background, methods, results, and conclusions
- Keywords: 5-7 terms for indexing and discoverability
- Introduction: Context, rationale, research gap, and study objectives
- Methods: Study design, setting, participants, data collection, and analysis approaches
- Results: Key findings presented clearly with appropriate tables and figures
- Discussion: Interpretation, implications for policy/practice, limitations, and future directions
- Conclusion: Summary of main findings and their significance
- References: Complete citations for all sources
Follow Reporting Guidelines
We strongly encourage adherence to established reporting guidelines for health services research:
- SQUIRE 2.0: For quality improvement studies and implementation research
- STROBE: For observational studies in epidemiology and health services
- PRISMA: For systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- CHEERS: For health economic evaluations
- COREQ: For qualitative research studies
- TIDieR: For intervention descriptions and implementation details
Ethics and Transparency
All health services research involving human subjects, healthcare data, or institutional information must receive appropriate ethics approval. Include your ethics approval number and institutional review board details in the methods section. Declare all competing interests, funding sources, and author contributions transparently.
Need Assistance?
Our editorial team is here to support you throughout the submission and peer review process.
For technical support, submission questions, or general inquiries, contact: [email protected]