Open Access & Peer-Reviewed
Submit ManuscriptWe welcome experienced reviewers in patient care, healthcare operations, nursing research, quality improvement, and health policy. Reviewer participation supports strong editorial decisions and protects publication standards.
Send your CV, ORCID if available, topic expertise list, and prior review experience summary. Include preferred manuscript categories and any methodological strengths such as trial design, implementation science, or health services evaluation.
Approved reviewers receive review invitations based on scope fit and availability.
Applicants with precise expertise tagging and documented review quality are matched faster and more accurately.
List 6 to 10 specific topic and method keywords instead of broad categories to improve assignment fit.
Maintain realistic availability updates so invitations can be sent where timelines can be respected.
Consistent contribution quality is measured through timeliness, clarity, methodological depth, and professional communication. Participants who maintain these standards create stronger editorial outcomes and higher trust across the publication ecosystem.
Respond on time, use structured feedback, disclose conflicts, and keep recommendations evidence linked. Reliable process behavior is as important as technical expertise.
High quality editorial or review service strengthens governance credibility, improves cross institutional visibility, and supports leadership opportunities in research quality programs.
Editorial and reviewer quality is measured by consistency, not isolated performance. Use structured communication, evidence linked comments, and realistic timelines on every assignment. Reliable behavior improves decision quality, strengthens professional credibility, and supports long term collaboration with the journal leadership team.
Share your expertise with the JPCS editorial office and contribute to strong patient care scholarship.
