Expertise Alignment
Editors prioritize reviewer-topic and methods fit for each submission.
Reviewer Registration
Reviewer Register
Reviewer Register
Journal of Peptides
Register for the JOP reviewer network and support high-quality peer evaluation of peptide research.
45%APC Savings
GlobalResearch Community
24/7Open Access
Reviewer Registration
Register as a JOP Reviewer
JOP welcomes qualified reviewers across peptide chemistry, biology, translational science, and development domains.
Detailed reviewer profiles improve assignment fit and review quality across diverse manuscript categories.
Complete registration details support fair workload planning and predictable turnaround governance.
Profile Requirements
Information to Include
Comprehensive reviewer profiles improve onboarding and assignment precision.
- Primary and secondary expertise areas relevant to expected manuscript types.
- Methodological strengths in analytics, design, or translational interpretation.
- Institutional role and publication background summary.
- Professional identifier such as ORCID for validation.
- Conflict disclosure and realistic review availability declaration.
Early-career reviewers are welcome when technical competence and publication familiarity are clearly demonstrated.
Onboarding includes confidentiality, quality expectations, and reviewer communication standards.
Assignment Model
How Reviewer Selection Works
Assignments prioritize expertise fit, neutrality, and turnaround reliability.
Conflict Screening
Potential conflicts are assessed before assignment confirmation.
Turnaround Reliability
Consistent review completion supports assignment trust.
Report Quality
Constructive and evidence-based review history strengthens selection priority.
Submission Planning
Execution Notes for Higher Acceptance Readiness
Use these practical notes to improve clarity, policy alignment, and review efficiency before final upload.
Editorial planning insight: Detailed reviewer profiles improve manuscript-expertise matching quality. This approach helps editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript faster without sacrificing rigor.
Author workflow guidance: Availability transparency supports realistic planning and reliable turnaround. Teams that apply this step early usually reduce revision friction and protect publication timelines.
Quality acceleration note: Conflict declarations must be complete at registration and assignment acceptance. The same practice also improves metadata quality and downstream indexing discoverability.
Submission strategy point: Methodological strengths should be highlighted for complex submission matching. It supports stronger decision transparency and more efficient peer-review communications.
Publication readiness reminder: Professional identifiers improve evaluation consistency and profile trust. This improves consistency between core manuscript sections and supporting files.
Operational recommendation: For reviewer register planning, document reviewer-response changes against exact manuscript locations; state practical limitations and boundary conditions explicitly. This supports cleaner editorial decisions and faster acceptance readiness.
Reviewer-facing clarity note: For reviewer register planning, confirm metadata fields and author identifiers before production lock; ensure data and code availability statements match policy language. This improves downstream indexing quality and retrieval relevance.
Register for JOP Peer Review
Submit your expertise profile and availability for reviewer onboarding.
Editorial office: [email protected]
