Decision Templates
Structured language for revise, accept, and decline outcomes.
Editor Resource Center
Editor Resources
Editor Resources
Journal of Sinusitis
Use structured policy and workflow tools to deliver consistent, high-confidence editorial decisions in JS.
RigorousReview Standards
FastPublication Process
GlobalResearch Community
OpenAccess Publication
Resource Hub
Editor Resources for Consistent Decision Quality
JS provides structured tools to improve fairness, speed, and governance confidence.
Resource support helps editors apply standards consistently across technically diverse submissions.
Standardized tools reduce variation in decision communication and policy interpretation.
Toolkit Components
What Editors Can Use
Resources are designed to support practical and policy-aligned decision-making.
Policy Quick Guides
Fast references for ethics, conflicts, and integrity scenarios.
Reviewer Reconciliation Aids
Guidance for resolving divergent reviewer recommendations.
Quality Checklists
Stepwise controls for methods, disclosure, and reporting completeness.
Escalation Channels
Defined pathways for handling serious integrity concerns.
Communication Standards
Frameworks for clear and professional author/reviewer interaction.
Operational Impact
Why Resource Use Matters
Consistent resource use improves throughput and publication governance quality.
- Improves clarity and consistency of editorial decisions.
- Reduces omission risk in complex manuscript handling.
- Supports fair management of ethics and conflict issues.
- Strengthens documentation quality for internal review.
- Improves turnaround reliability while preserving rigor.
Submission Planning
Execution Notes for Higher Acceptance Readiness
Use these practical notes to improve clarity, policy alignment, and review efficiency before final upload.
Editorial planning insight: Decision templates improve consistency and clarity in author-facing editorial communication. This approach helps editors and reviewers evaluate the manuscript faster without sacrificing rigor.
Author workflow guidance: Policy quick guides reduce ambiguity in ethics and disclosure-related scenarios. Teams that apply this step early usually reduce revision friction and protect publication timelines.
Quality acceleration note: Quality checklists reduce omission risk in technically complex manuscripts. The same practice also improves metadata quality and downstream indexing discoverability.
Submission strategy point: Escalation pathways support prompt handling of integrity concerns. It supports stronger decision transparency and more efficient peer-review communications.
Publication readiness reminder: Resource-driven workflows improve turnaround predictability and fairness. This improves consistency between core manuscript sections and supporting files.
Operational recommendation: For editor resources planning, document reviewer-response changes against exact manuscript locations; state practical limitations and boundary conditions explicitly. This supports cleaner editorial decisions and faster acceptance readiness.
Reviewer-facing clarity note: For editor resources planning, confirm metadata fields and author identifiers before production lock; ensure data and code availability statements match policy language. This improves downstream indexing quality and retrieval relevance.
Use JS Editorial Resources
Apply standardized tools to improve reliability and decision quality.
Editorial office: [email protected]
