Journal of Thrombosis and treatments

Journal of Thrombosis and treatments

Journal of Thrombosis and treatments – Reviewer Register

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Reviewer Register

Join the JTT Reviewer Network

JTT invites experienced reviewers in thrombosis, anticoagulation, vascular medicine, and related translational domains to support quality focused manuscript evaluation.

Rigorous - Review StandardsCanonical Metric
Fast - Publication ProcessCanonical Metric
Global - Research CommunityCanonical Metric
Open - Access PublicationCanonical Metric

Eligibility

  • Relevant publication and domain expertise in thrombosis science.
  • Ability to assess methods and interpretation quality objectively.
  • Commitment to review confidentiality and timeline discipline.
  • Willingness to disclose conflicts before accepting assignments.

Registration Information

Send CV, expertise keywords, review history summary, and preferred manuscript categories. Include methodological strengths such as trial analysis, observational epidemiology, or implementation evaluation where applicable.

Accurate profiles improve reviewer assignment precision.

Profile Review

Editorial office validates fit and expertise relevance.

Availability Setup

Reviewer cadence expectations are aligned before first invitation.

Policy Briefing

New reviewers receive guidance on standards and communication quality.

Initial Invitations

Assignments are matched to declared topic and method strengths.

Reliable availability updates improve invitation efficiency and reduce decline cycles.

Review Quality Continuity

High value reviewing combines timeliness, methodological precision, and clear recommendation language. Reviewers who consistently separate major concerns from minor corrections help editors make faster and more defensible decisions. Reliable reports should reference evidence directly, identify practical revision priorities, and avoid ambiguous comments that increase author confusion. This disciplined approach strengthens publication quality, reduces unnecessary rounds of revision, and improves trust across the thrombosis research community.

Assessment Discipline

Evaluate design validity, analytical coherence, and conclusion proportionality in a fixed order. Structured assessment improves consistency and makes recommendation logic easier for editors and authors to follow.

Communication Standard

Provide specific, constructive comments with practical next steps. If availability changes, notify the editorial office early so reassignment can protect decision timelines.

Consistent reviewer performance is defined by clear evidence based judgment delivered on schedule.

Practical Review Benchmarks

JTT encourages reviewers to follow a clear performance benchmark on each assignment: acknowledge invitation feasibility early, provide structured major and minor points, link critical concerns to evidence, and submit within the committed window. This benchmark keeps reports useful for editors and actionable for authors. Reviewers who combine methodological precision with dependable timing contribute directly to faster, fairer, and more reliable publication decisions across thrombosis research submissions.

Consistent use of a benchmark approach improves review quality and lowers avoidable second round delays.

Register Your Reviewer Profile

Share your expertise and contribute to rigorous thrombosis publication quality.