Issue Summary
Proposed title, objective, and strategic relevance to thrombosis practice.
Submit Special Issue
Submit Your Special Issue Proposal to JTT
This page outlines the formal submission route for special issue proposals in thrombosis and treatment science. Provide a complete package with theme rationale, guest editor details, scope boundaries, and delivery timeline. Complete submissions reduce back and forth and allow faster editorial decision making.
Rigorous - Review StandardsCanonical Metric
Fast - Publication ProcessCanonical Metric
Global - Research CommunityCanonical Metric
Open - Access PublicationCanonical Metric
Submission Package Content
Include all core elements in one communication cycle for efficient evaluation.
Editorial Team
Names, affiliations, role scope, and availability confirmation.
Topic Structure
Detailed subthemes and expected manuscript categories.
Operational Timeline
Target milestones from call launch to final publication.
How to Submit
Send proposal materials to the editorial office by email. If preferred, you can initiate via the simple submission form and then provide supporting files directly in the follow up communication. Use a clear subject line and identify the lead guest editor for all correspondence.
- Attach proposal narrative and editor profiles.
- Include expected submission pipeline assumptions.
- State any proposed partnerships or invited contributors.
- Confirm one operational contact for timeline updates.
After Submission
The office acknowledges receipt, performs scope and feasibility checks, and may request targeted revisions. Approved proposals proceed to call setup and workflow activation. Quality of planning directly affects approval speed, so complete and realistic documentation is essential.
Strong proposals include both scientific rationale and delivery governance.
Submission Quality Controls
Before sending your proposal, validate that scope, governance, and timeline assumptions are consistent. The most common reason for revision requests is mismatch between ambition and execution detail.
Scope Precision
Define a theme narrow enough for coherence and broad enough for quality manuscript flow.
Editor Capacity
Confirm guest editors can manage screening, review, and communication load.
Contributor Pipeline
Show realistic contributor outreach assumptions and contingency options.
Risk Handling
Include a response plan for reviewer delays and uneven manuscript quality.
Final Submission Review Before Sending
Validate that the proposal narrative, timeline table, and editor role matrix are internally consistent. Mismatched assumptions are the most common source of revision requests in special issue submission review.
One coherent package is faster to evaluate than incremental partial submissions.
Consistent milestone tracking is the most reliable predictor of special issue delivery quality.
Delivery Governance Reminder
Special issue success is operational as well as scientific. Define response timelines, reviewer backup paths, and communication ownership early. Governance clarity improves schedule reliability and protects quality across all issue phases.
Operational clarity on roles and timelines improves special issue delivery reliability.
Quality Continuity Note
Consistent process quality depends on clear ownership, timely communication, and concise documentation of key actions. Applying these habits at every stage improves predictability, reduces avoidable delay, and strengthens confidence in both editorial and operational outcomes.
Practical consistency in communication and documentation keeps quality outcomes stable over time.
Start the Special Issue Submission Process
Use the route that fits your workflow and send full proposal materials for evaluation.
